Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Photographs Push First Amendment Boundaries

I don’t know much about Richard Prince, but I like to think that he’s in the business of operating at the edges of what’s acceptable. Whether he’s pushing the boundaries or just working in the grey area I think it’s important for art to have trouble makers. I’m more comfortable thinking about blank canvasses and drawing on top of images as important for pushing boundaries that other work can be built upon than worrying about whether this is something that will be admired centuries from now. I believe the title of this piece Jonathan Blaustein wrote for me: “You Don’t Always Get Art, But We Still Need More Of It“.
So, what about the grey area when it comes to photography and privacy. This is certainly a contentious and topical issue when it comes to paparazzi chasing celebrities or people taking pictures of slaughterhouses. Recent attempts at legislation in those areas (here, here, here) suggest people would like to limit the first amendment right to photography in public places. An exhibition at the Julie Saul Gallery in Chelsea seems to be pushing the boundary of privacy and photography. Photographer Arne Svenson shot pictures of residents in a neighboring building with a telephoto lens from his own apartment across the street. In a story for the New York Times Magazine, Photography Director Kathy Ryan contemplates the artistry vs. privacy issue:
These particular pictures are problematic, even for those, like me, who overwhelmingly side with artists and journalists when it comes to questions of freedom of expression. I support the artist’s right to make and exhibit his art and feel Svenson has the right to exhibit these pictures. But if images surfaced in a gallery of my daughter in our home, shot by a photographer using a long lens without our knowledge, I wouldn’t be happy. So the question arises, is it art when it’s a photograph of someone else, but not when it’s you or your family?
(Read the rest here)
I think in the end Arne Svenson may run into “a reasonable expectation of privacy” which is what makes street photography and making pictures in public possible and taking pictures of people in their homes illegal (Note: consult a lawyer, this is just my opinion).
But, I agree with Kathy in her conclusion that “the freedoms enjoyed by artists and journalists are worth possible breaches of privacy.” Boundary pushing is good for art, we don’t always “get it”, but it allows other artists to build upon it.

source:
http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2013/06/05/photographs-push-first-amendment-boundaries/



Ford Mustang - This Pony is Always In Style

Ford Mustang - This Pony is Always In Style

© Christine Till


Art lovers who liked this also liked:
in love metal prints
couple in love metal prints
kissing metal prints
sweethearts metal prints
lory metal prints

macaws metal prints
macaw metal prints
cockatoo metal prints
fauna acrylic prints
fauna metal prints

plush bear metal prints
bike ride metal prints
harley davidsons metal prints
de leon metal prints
yamaha metal prints

bmw metal prints
transport metal prints
runs metal prints
traveling metal prints
bear metal prints

harley davidson metal prints
harley metal prints
motorcycles metal prints
bike metal prints
bikes metal prints

bikers art